Re: Maintaining potentially orphaned packages in Debian Commons team
Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi [No need to CC me, I already get this 3 times] Small comment. On 6/5/26 22:15, Andreas Tille wrote: > This is exactly the gap I am trying to discuss. If we believes that such > packages should become formally orphaned rather than move to Debian > Commons, what is the practical path to achieve that? In my opinion, if you want to maintain it in Debian Commons, you are salvaging the package and should use the salvation process. Debian Commons is intended to declare weak ownership, which is something else than no ownership. If you are willing to stick your name to a package in uploaders at least, ITS should work for you already. If you don't, than Debian Commons shouldn't be part of your solution. Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 585 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsC7BAABCABvBYJqI+MgCRCcXJnrBb11CkcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmdR3qjaU8BEPCUyzPO+1pEnihj2JPiLDJa7At0nkuys yxYhBFi2bUhza+k7BS3mcpxcmesFvXUKAAB7zggAoJkPuTy6Xkw53VPXbnz60LqS OGJ+SqZzI60Y97OpVcU5rYvjqFYo/JWWYFkN4Jg1AZIcTY11bC5d9tXV55J1k6Sq AKq85iDDkr2zY97PXVvncOdwpk5vUV7z1UeMPICNy86TGM5JfJ4o2SpX4kPjCPgX zRLw5O3bwqqqVFtx4lomUYQud9W2TOi8+PlbN9Kb9W8I62vvViZQF9FxdvNUZZoC ziuifdptWILRaeySfMKC/vF2F0UdE4BLt5IYmP6mPBLcw/1+Bh5WJnitTDRk/ud7 sWIHmbRFxtx8hn5eM+Xp9Uy+M0uWtD87KXIEH93v5nfMVIp3sMsQ08/eGIJoVg== =wQar -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----