Re: Maintaining potentially orphaned packages in Debian Commons team
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 02:43:24PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: >> However, that experience also reinforced my impression that we currently >> lack a generally accepted process for dealing with packages that appear >> to have no active maintenance but are not formally orphaned. > >sorry if this is a stupid question: instead of a new process, why not >propose changing the existing MIA process to forceably orphan such >packages? The MIA process already orphans packages of MIA people. This doesn't cover everything. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmokJQwtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG LLwP/io557uypuENJmjRKWPnIz67afwc0KnRC8qBPIn5vCkc9HvobeIv64Kx+NeR G0It8r3+u3qSJGIew/zvaf2a7tUZ7Z5zQbDAj6w/pqaglhuOUYk4y7J+/DiUquZS 8SRmT7leEZaCA85p3al8QNcgCXP8Kw/Jkwg6Ljo5mBDEZJuq8o/Jj+EnSI64ylWm +tLVhq0sVllV8RHmKVQmOCTMyQxQRCrjUtdzEtFgG5tg4j8ir1ab9lT9SBwPZ3El Zn2ag6UTnWJFWX0bF5Hyk7hrhkASuXcHGVXAJ61bVK9OJMyCZ9hBaQLmIs7zlyc6 bX0MxLP4A29ldy7Bz7JPyBI/VzYkCbJo91zVdVPVKezkNdpQ4sAQHoiCJe5UD5xJ 9Uq/l5vCs8znqfwRXR09nn0Z44838Ipd5kLlZRW7zcdfzZG1+JdJludfeCCuHX9V pGiHzpRlmWQsT79ijL1orOPfpKfDShRPp7pe8O7Izd8iLs4ZtS7dAgzbJHyW7O+V jyBF6v2WQInjRDkxiw1cqd3yFZc7+CXlZELkNAyVVAWcuW963jZq7JCPOGRVbn9Q 3xPOhlb9pYLn6l5c8eQf6RvLajIiGuh4PNSUikx6H/Xe8YzoGZY1gg4EzgNFzECB MAgI9rcyRYo9Vgy4pEp3D05CDkK8bZ771O7HWUtFEUbLI+c/ =9QT8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----