Re: Package braa: Increment epoch in accordance with the Policy

Roland Clobus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 19/06/2026 09:01, Sven Geuer wrote:
> upstream's braa sources suffer from non-incremental version numbers:
> 0.82 < 0.9 < 0.9.1 according to the order of commits (don't rely on
> the order of tags displayed). The current packaging in Debian has
> version 0.82-7.
> 
> To be able to fix RC bug #1137251, I would like to increase the
> epoch to 1 and update the package to version 1:0.9.1.

You can change the version numbering slightly [1]: 'however, it may need to be reformatted to fit into the package management system’s format and comparison scheme.'

It looks like 0.82 was actually 0.8.2, so why not release 0.9.1 with the reversed logic as '0.91+actually0.9.1'?
The package is at 0.x, so I guess there will be time to introduce semver [2] version numbers until 1.x gets released.

With kind regards,
Roland Clobus

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#version
[2] https://semver.org/
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HxAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.