Re: Package braa: Increment epoch in accordance with the Policy

Sven Geuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Roland, Tobias & Michael,

On Fri, 2026-06-19 at 16:19 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > Hi Roland,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2026-06-19 at 09:20 +0200, Roland Clobus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 19/06/2026 09:01, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > > > upstream's braa sources suffer from non-incremental version
> > > > numbers:
> > > > 0.82 < 0.9 < 0.9.1 according to the order of commits (don't
> > > > rely on
> > > > the order of tags displayed). The current packaging in Debian
> > > > has
> > > > version 0.82-7.
> > > > 
> > > > To be able to fix RC bug #1137251, I would like to increase the
> > > > epoch to 1 and update the package to version 1:0.9.1.
> > > 
> > > You can change the version numbering slightly [1]: 'however, it
> > > may
> > > need to be reformatted to fit into the package management
> > > system’s
> > > format and comparison scheme.'
> > > 
> > > It looks like 0.82 was actually 0.8.2, so why not release 0.9.1
> > > with
> > > the reversed logic as '0.91+actually0.9.1'?
> > 
> > Thanks for your idea. On the other hand 0.82 fits the once
> > apparently
> > deliberately chosen numbering pattern [3] with even versions
> > numbers
> > 0.4, 0.41, 0.42, 0.421 (sic!).
> > 
> > > The package is at 0.x, so I guess there will be time to introduce
> > > semver [2] version numbers until 1.x gets released.
> > 
> > Given upstream's sparse activities on braa, I feel not too
> > confident
> > that a 1.0.0 will be released even in years.
> > 
> > So, I still wonder whether bumping the epoch would be the
> > appropriate
> > choice in this case.
> > 
> > Are there other ideas?
> 
> Have you contacted upstream and asked them to cut a new release,
> preferable following semver?
> 

Thanks for your thoughts. Will reach out to upstream and fix the bug
independently of the version number issue.

Cheers,
Sven
-- 
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 854 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZYaT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.