Re: Concerning uniliateral decision making with respect to the coreutils package

"Theodore Tso" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I will note that Ubuntu's rewrite of coreutils breaks a number of test
suites (including xfstests) because its outputs are different and this
breaks golden output comparisons.  I expect it will also break various
expect scripts that sysadmins might have in production.

Bug reports about fstests being broken on Ubuntu have been rejected[1]
because it's perceived by kernel developers as Ubuntu just being
silly(tm).  Given that some rather the primary test regression
appliance is based on Debian[2], I would consider it.... unfortunate
and regrettable if coreutils were replaced by Canonical's rust
rewrite.  And that's before we consider the over 100 CVE's that were
*introduced* by the rewrite of coreutils[3].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/[email protected]/
[2] https://thunk.org/gce-xfstests
[3] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-Rust-Coreutils-Audit

Regards,

					- Ted
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.