Re: Don't run Salsa CI in vain - a disabled CI is better than a persistently failing one

Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jul 2026 00:45:06 +0500

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 10:25:46PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>in particular the very commit that gets tagged and
>uploaded to Debian should have had the Salsa CI pass first

(this, again, goes against established workflows and is very very 
inconvenient to do, unless you are one of those maintainers who don't build 
locally)

> Otherwise the point of the CI is moot.

I agree.

I may disable Salsa CI in my packages and start ignoring these threads so 
that neither I nor other people spend time on unnecessary red results.


-- 
WBR, wRAR

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 894 B)