Re: Don't run Salsa CI in vain - a disabled CI is better than a persistently failing one

Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> writes:

> Alert fatigue is a well known phenomenon. The purpose of a CI system
> is to be 99% green. In the 1% of cases where it fails, it should cause
> development to stop so developers can research why, and fix a
> regression before it goes into production or before new feature
> development continues.

Maybe you should investigate
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/commits/master?ref_type=heads
which seems to be have a lot more than 1% failed pipelines.... :)