Re: Concerning uniliateral decision making with respect to the coreutils package
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:04:29 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Russ Allbery [26/Jul 5:33pm -07] wrote: > Free software provides me with features inherent in its status of free > software that non-free software does not. It is therefore difficult to > argue that free software is clearly inferior to any non-free software > because, whatever other merits it has, it grants me those features > (freedoms), and those matter to me. > > There are cases where the non-free software is sufficiently better that I > can't justify using the free software despite those freedoms, but the free > software has, for people like me who care about those freedoms, a > substantial inherent advantage due to its licensing. > > This is not true of copyleft software specifically, as distinct from the > category of free software in general. Copyleft software does not give me, > as a software user, anything of immediate value over BSD-licensed > software. In fact, it's objectively worse in several small ways because > there is a long, tedious legal document that I have to read and follow > that limits my freedom to change and redistribute the software as I choose > by, for example, prohibiting me from removing sometimes-annoying output > from commands. I see, thank you, I understand better now. > When chosing a license for one's own work, the cost of the insurance is > not egregious, and it annoys me more than it annoys others, so I > understand the position of people who always adopt the insurance. But this > is a tactical decision, not an ethical one. It still seems to me that the position of the user of the software and the developer of the software will be different in this regard. To the user qua user it's just a tool, but to the developer it may be an ethical choice, in the expressive sense that I outlined in my other message. =2D-=20 Sean Whitton --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmpnHx0ZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQMDHD/94XpH6AqxO3noOfbkOQDCa 9aO6IvGAEhDBbZTZZg/mt81xK+F0BES2TBc9Bpzb2c7jg1yPFgKMLBm9w+9q/DaK tp/eKYlHVxQnz0h0oGKRzOKAURYDNRe9s7xJMOQO83aKDKSM7/NwpQxlJ1rPE4WT 8SmymVZed5sLuzZuOVSFf/3V72rK1I7F3sTwu0xEWUpAt6NWsxmXqtN1+Eh1hmXQ rRQUWg1pREFF0hULcTPWDfH2Uj0I9y5jSfSZpaM8RD/lizU98F9602StEKHRf/FA lF1+86eXHbByrlXuIaGb43VYgM6/zZYW8kOBLM9JfLjhfhF1Rg7KBB969wI03ymj CTz6ivZcGofDxPpEzYpjN46BjWLFo+VI0lKm+6RhX8m7+uNsYsQtQR4f88unhIp5 iAZGaFYw2zzeagMVaYM7uGyjR8JjqOlF1K9Ib0aS58xtcP36uCi7oBV+KOQGJPjT ByLS2Ea+zCofo26qrtQqqelA5lA8HlYhTOZODVN4v1O4pPqnj9O4+luhbftLeNYa sAHkOWakM78H/aXsp+RbG6D3FIvtbAeIla/wvzwOaLnkQnVAurK37jbnr5WpsYqI QP4gnzj+/DJ5F45eepcQmXOAVN39Ce/KBh26cH5w2AvoXK+sc7nnsFSLTbD6ky9S 5QCQYi6HuNPKPSxBPHbecg== =4oEc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--