Re: expected baseline changes for forky
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 08:48:07AM +0200, Jose Luis Tallon wrote: >>>In order to ease the user/devel experience I want for isa-support to create test for forky baseline >>> >>>For now I test for armhf: >>> >>>armv8-support >>> CPU feature checking - require ARMv8 >>> >>>neon-support >>Not sure I understand this. You want to raise armhf to ARMv8? Why would >>anyone then install a 32-bit port when they could just use the 64-bit >>port in the first place? > >Think older Raspberri Pi and derivatives .... What about them? Are you thinking about armel vs armhf? -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmp+11QtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG 2kwP/2SZZ+OxNWtPVb/C5lcHKmGwv5e/yER+3W6HMv2R0fsP0f3KMWpG7ZbPkdjj IZmr2Kj+4gv4M7uokRfLSYkN46BzyUJ5WkC55zUNdbal64trY1zy4Ef+z7MEqz53 tYfvojk8cmAPihbY2t/9bL7cLHvbOGH+R1QXb40zrPls604XY3K2E+Rvd9a1yLEE 8bi+9MaY3Lh+uX80CaA0GPhav9OBHPARNgvQNKBCSsPGUXn/20+Fh2qpsNUOsQMF 0CjwHST4YWEeErQO3UgfNBoS8sJic8S257nYdRWxYuwrqd/2+ArIAcQHHjvP1noF 4tDabTG2pEPvuJPejuzugVxqdjty3QWa4/2wnEcTW7Ltsj5QkfKkMZnN+OwfJy0x q7V8wPL7tpJJHVXCTqD49HJnw43Kkk0zpDq0Fb9LsaaC88jpBXFpOCHBUgHZcLXL TeaZR4gdnQUn7MmNxOIyvFhiB1wOgTZggOQVVHUKOHMfYvHMjapvSOgT+2p1WS0G /4f+IlS5DiCbhI74V97t7BdFUqczAqqdTc3jH/xpi5vCc+zQZ5N6nIb5z1l7ldDF e7iCOx/5rVStEeJ60gzVAdkvRKq/KogYsmK48o91VG8y4vtgBpCGGyfhfqt4sjMo 3rGvl8OrExIK19kLSawJfgkYyRIEyUFeOVs+YeifFG8zmrZt =spzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----