Re: proposal [Forky i386] : linux-image-pentium4
Simon Richter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On 8/15/26 19:06, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The usual i386-specific problem is the excess precision of the x87,
> which goes away with a higher baseline.
Exactly, but that, too, breaks compatibility, and the sole reason for
the i386 architecture these days is compatibility.
Especially with games, I would expect that quite a few of them use the
excess precision to avoid z-fighting, that's precisely the sort of hack
you'd do one week before release.
It would make sense to raise the baseline if someone actually wanted to
run scientific software in 32-bit mode, but I believe there is consensus
that this is nonsensical.
Simon
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtjuqOJSXmNjSiX3Tfr04e7CZCBEFAmqATZcACgkQfr04e7CZ CBGDxQf9FGsJwOHwiE1S5yuO8VNAWoBg4csAiEnKzSw2kGAkr8jxZ6ns7atNA0N6 9LIjDIrY2f/bBZAC/zz2t55wGjF0nzvSYYcEhpgvBlFwUnKMF38rUT2Yj7aH8wX8 W2jsbxPuOEqk1b54YMQwChki16860fwFXfdmhuWPsU3EEbsqcvXdxEaluemCnnPA Pk9ZuhkPrRoU1YqUiIeD89c7FYSiCoYkFsLELdjBvgNVjJdRyFnxHEcgPCwTDcS+ ata493fe2ulWHPid6h0exCuOXWSgR0QzjvOUctbdxuEejKRmAgScQOGjYtvz91l0 1H4u0RpMeXu+YMsXhDDwk1gCVvQH7g== =IyLD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----