Re: d/copyright years when upstream does not use years?

Peter Pentchev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 02:08:57PM +0200, Agathe Porte wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> (please keep me Cc'ed, not subscribed to the list)
> 
> TL;DR: copyright years are a mess, do we really want to force copyright
> years using a lintian tag and force debian maintainers to update their
> d/copyright for d/* each year? I propose we rework these lintian tags, I
> can do the work but wanted to discuss it on -devel first.

First off, yay, somebody else who likes copyright notices without years :)

So IMHO there are both good and bad things in copyright notices that
do not include years:
- good thing: you don't need to update it each year, and it does not
  get very, very long as you skip a year every now and then :)
- bad thing: it seems that, at least in the United States, such
  a copyright notice may not be recognized in court

As such, it is (obviously) up to each upstream project and each package
maintainer to decide whether they want to keep the copyright years.
I personally have been actively removing them from the projects that
I am upstream for, with the full knowledge that this may be an issue in
the US. However, it is completely understandable that there may be
upstream authors (including e.g. my current employer) who do not feel
comfortable with the possible US issues, and so they keep the years in
for their projects.

Having said that, I personally think that it is still the common case
that people would rather include the copyright years. As such, IMHO
the Lintian tag is still a good thing, and in the very few cases when
it triggers for a project that simply does not have copyright years,
it should be overridden: this is exactly the case when overriding
a Lintian tag is supposed to happen. That's what I've been doing in
the Debian packaging for the above-mentioned projects where I have
removed the copyright notices as an upstream author, and I personally
do not see that as a maintenance burden.

So I would suggest, at least for the present (while upstream projects
without copyright years are a very rare occassion and there are actually
good reasons for upstream authors to put the copyright years in), to
not change anything in Lintian and override that tag for the few
projects where it is warranted. Let's see if, with time, more upstream
projects drop the copyright years; if that happens, let's discuss this
again :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
PGP key:        https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEELuenpRf8EkzxFcNUZR7vsCUn3xMFAmqITCEACgkQZR7vsCUn
3xOmjxAAj0JUqAJ9ZY9qUtBgjbNws/BXbMzn5vXB6r0nfTS2XfZLgcfZah8qwpoz
/UslGbaiGSW5xshHfaRT3AWZux7rixY9QyfvLNFhxiFp6IoQaFOj2k/z0eIYTmYW
nirW9ofZJQD1OPgLmg5wfdHQspRRoZxirAjoKRAJiFOpCJY12i2YptHj6RAosfNk
2gzDUirT4UHHBeW1i/K4qGkYt+O+Q4QHlVu148BUazT9WntiKnZeqdolibKKCxD1
qf00LiafUXT6O+t8WMLzeO9ka3Smc+BNQFycqwDnPhr+tc5wy2684m1OHreumTtb
69sAqEWX7UMsrmgMGa8dywKHZC+kdIQlqQtGviI9Kq9nEpuEFRxMFCObirE8/g2K
lMStgh1yLcdQWRQmP82xKmDbFCa3+vzuJghHdYQau3Dx9v9Jl/U1o1LTN542w1RZ
jiI0ag0GXXjxX3nlDGgXIh76hd83vgbw0LuNKw6E9DI7YfUL0CIQIqrcm+4aLU2V
7TuzEHbA8QyLPnArMwIk2oEYrKzp5jCqBSvd8wwIAACK0skgiMNj2c+NaGpl8ED9
0OIEGI5GKwQooi+Tsv7ni/DcbPU2TrQ/YlO65oQ6brTcD1A0esu+ve5weHqJRf6X
5vXNSbyYBMYs+SVh7m+Cr2c8mLOmO7tzbwtxipyZQH99gum2tcc=
=Ea2H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.