Re: Git branch layout for packages requiring DFSG-cleaning
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 06:38:14AM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: >Yes. Until recently I had a rather ad-hoc setup: > - ignoring upstream tarballs, > - not using gbp for importing upstream sources, > - tracking upstream git as follows: branch `master+dfsg` had > DFSG-dubious files removed (compared to the upstream `master`). So > with each upstream version I did a manual merge of upstream tag into > this branch, before merging it into my packaging branch. Then per DEP-14 this cleaned up branch should be named upstream/*. >Hm, I guess there is no way to make this look for a latest upstream tag >rather than a tarball? There is, but uscan implies tarballs so it will make a tarball and then gbp will import it, they won't merge the tag directly. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmqL+8AtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG n90QAM1QRLGTHOw4q2Mc2wSuyVVbLqeqSdHEwS6L9pIpQwgfw9JEJc2nRtm0CRiV EPI6xtY05Kxk2z8ajOWZhJAVnwhavNcGNlZlA+TFFFDpyfDCBI2ss1HF+i8lf3fS DvZ6NBKZsvpKgEGEhzrnITlYimAtXLOyJk6Ix0XwESbBpgBFyLr4a4kpy5uVEW8L tN4h+DCVGD+307h3w7n+/4+8peelgZpRD32DhJ04W2+0JZDWK7yN01S8vgOYuHNt jYKley4QXPEzJkmjx8iAH+LpGX82gDUmcWPxq6vaUwM9qYQgOUiq6IADYUyrNBfr RHFKW5SQBWLOVLH6QFYW9jABP9/lUlmDa2uiNw90F+0akA5ObzZgn4EkSB8UBYgh CVErBkqa9zu6AuA3vDmEyHOwQpIYGk1Pq1j2kZhIzrK/6pUOpkhv8dQpdLEc/vkr wPqY9kRspZl6jkregYunWIGOTYcD9fJohzVGbkIMUGQq6Ez8GZ0raSCro9ZJV8ls n5/ZbCTSVuOG2plCKiGJpqiFv4PBgg2cqencS/EnE3Dl6dLImck4+Ircd8jZZiPn Dh8KwF/F4bt+2BqbQFlqz3dZCIzGAIttZYvWKA42FeQ8IFH5fK+aOG5PIcpJq8aA FseaWGubwTUkZkKjB6suaIsIH5jgSdrt4oosz9sslMJuCP0a =ltX3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----