Re: Open vs proprietary LLMs

* Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> [260825 08:31]:
>The GR discussion focused on the use of this technology for Debian
>contributions. When discussing usage, the level of freeness sounds like
>a more secondary concern than if the discussion was about inclusion of
>LLMs in the Debian archive. And it looks like, for ballot options
>proposers, the level of freeness was not that important compared to
>other factors/axes.

I want to highlight this. Indeed we can discuss free-ness of the 
models, but the other issues are much more pressing.

Option H for example doesn't address free-ness at all, and I think 
that is very much "correct".

Best,
Chris