Re: Results for LLM usage in Debian
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I produced¹ another version of the results graph, with all pairwise results and percentages, so that it's easier to read, for example, that the community is split 64%/36% between the winning option and the most popular "ban" option (Debian is created by humans). Or 61%/39% with the most popular "discourage" option. https://people.debian.org/~lucas/gr-2026-002/results.png On a very personal note, I regret that the winning option does not acknowledge all the legitimate concerns around AI: environmental impact, copyright and licensing uncertainty, the health of Free Software communities, and the strain of aggressive scraping on the open web. The GR results give us raw numbers about our opinion, and a direction, but we have a lot of work ahead of us to act as a community and understand how we can continue to accommodate the very large minority that would have preferred to ban or discourage AI. Lucas ¹ obligatory disclosure: the script used is AI-generated
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE/t7ByzN7z1CfQ8IkORS1MvTfvpkFAmqSjsQACgkQORS1MvTf vpk6JQ//amizlUbpO3/TnJmS1SZyAFu1K4I9fXoHschdnP0ShV/oruJTKv4e2BMJ VTkZZhwPG+J73tYX4wTFx8w4Ez2a3EZGcbBqHlqrOqf7sdJ8EPr9PIEpRwAjUmID YmHN6/+2v+7pjrG0IIQNvEdG0eLnUS49M9OpT0wK8x8pz8RjcW19AtpZcHw/88FU Dih2pOloxRKuzkRPJoSG1Ny4oQb1DbKR1iuzwxP/abfJdBIHFIxJqFvDpDBXnfwL VXPhxg1jSrbmmw3FLNHOxUE00u8KVWme+EABBvN7R6OspyW7+V3GwckGrnzF2uLu oj2FCCK9+QwgnCqgvy9nzEPC0i1xYs72YJp8vGGCNB3jD7mfNAgg8mX4deXKVvMn edLP+SQ1pdJH8qXU+iEUhYsbuVRW6pn36KgYjkJJr0yKgz8KaGnc2YJG0i/1LXCa ylaVMmsiACNvoT1ofLzvj4g3IHyboK63jwz1kJl2mGRHSMF66OCPpiu2Y7y7twuQ 2t7PQpGukhGn5FjC28xjoMCOO+K/zHdzxBVN95gUCIZSHqhcXlyv9Yy60mNm6dTu mCHRqBw/Bx6l7mZ4TLWR7CzGeMIFsovdgh1bWs99QVB2XDBKyyQ4JpsPbJAeB3Ef Ux9HyskzdF5s0DT9efjO+IEwpuiEzLGQZ2opIrWEoPK/gR08X34= =cr5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----