Re: Uncoordinated upload of the rustified librsvg

Mattia Rizzolo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.gnome.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 09:04:49PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> It sounds to me like you're saying that to fix librsvg being out of
> date on 11 arches, we need to make it out of date on every
> architecture.

"out of date" has a specific meaning in the context of buildds: it means
that the latest version is not built.  Reverting back to a previous
version of librsvg would actually make all the arches "up to date" in
that lingo.

> What is the actual consequence of the latest librsvg being unbuildable
> on those arches? The old binaries won't automatically be removed
> there, right?

In this case not, but be aware that the archive software used in Debian
Ports doesn't have support for "cruft", which means that if a package
bumps its soname the old binaries are removed as soon as the last source
package building them disappear.

> Instead of putting all the blame on the GNOME team, maybe you could
> have expressed your concerns during the months that librsvg was still
> in experimental?

I at least had that impression even while being a bystander.  I do
recall Adrian mumbling about how annoying rust was for ports and I even
recall some discussion involving rsvg in it several months ago.
You really didn't understand that rsvg was a concerns for the ports
architectures?

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

_______________________________________________
pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEi3hoeGwz5cZMTQpICBa54Yx2K60FAlvevm0ACgkQCBa54Yx2
K6308RAAkcbYK+vwIv2Do6x7cYzaN+f/Qj1RyGFZhsrzeA4m2lGzX4wmP4v0gY86
M//pb3ndZbKUQbmCyxGEiz5lcnJsDEGpqeXqVTuJuddDg7MrMy+/NY7W3tW7kMQs
Hou0WQ1iSKocSPfzZu9l7x4I2dNzVm6jsl8XwMDK813YBOuWxdIauZQ8nB0XbNWS
Jw6G5NrokLP3wdBDrmnpDCfB9z2zCWbvBKHuKu7gW0jpssIoEf/zWd1cmRSjlj+l
OH2UHwtVslLJ/25MQxY2fYbNABAXQw5MWBSvtbhIfBMhYhLZs5Mk7mzsYEDC8bdk
Sr3uodz/FlipTaB1zvYnuwzEGNTUH4MVwq8N2d/P3lMtPc0vCOwTbKLIcrp8h2oG
9iPCOAjhUxERgPp3D6byKIFYvwS/ylfQ+Yk8Vq355L9aXD4CrJbx70ncaz6CRshI
NcZJk/l3AWQPLMwASSrAFmY33SDieEhi6+KOKlTu/L9AGSvHzaUfpwEZ1xGjvEB7
nTVgmOm7GkXu8tKwal86wOJqsHc4Zx+ij9+gzN1aoz9GqUopobj3A4Tj2fY6h8lz
y49Is87F5fslA8bE8jHfwWEXz7ou/rPbN5Ekg9WGqxcJAgPRm2VlirKJgrRDaV6z
VqkuSt99YloYdwO453ECSW5DzB5EquBMP/mQ9XvO52pKWcpTlhk=
=U1ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.