Re: Uncoordinated upload of the rustified librsvg

Jeremy Bicha <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.gnome.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome
Message-ID <CAAajCMYkmAt1jmKPeh4EWH2gom5rRdhjJ9w+V-8KZCt5dubtDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 5:54 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm really annoyed and disappointed by this move and feel really let down by this
> behavior. No heads up, no coordination, no nothing.

There was some coordination but the coordination was for release
architectures. The coordination was with the Release Team and not with
whoever maintains ports. See https://bugs.debian.org/907626

I guess to some degree I consider the ports to be as much or as little
a part of Debian as nonfree is. Officially, they aren't part of a
strict definition of Debian, but they are part of the broader Debian
ecosystem.

It's difficult for me to even know how to raise issues with ports. I
filed https://bugs.debian.org/908600 for a fairly minor package 2
months ago. I guess I did that sort of right except I only did the
usertag for kfreebsd and not for hurd. I even did some minor
enablement work for mutter for hurd/kfreebsd recently but I'm
absolutely not a porter and I've never used those ports.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

_______________________________________________
pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.