Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60
Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Simon McVittie <[email protected]> (2019-03-02): > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify > > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is not > > > > the full GNOME 3 desktop used on other architectures, for example > > > > the GNOME-2-derived gnome-session-flashback > > In the absence of other progress, I've staged this in git. I'll release > it soon if nobody else in the team gets there first. The resulting > metapackage appears to be installable on a s390x buster qemu VM with only > sid as an apt source (so, only able to see the version of gjs in sid that > we want to migrate, and not the one in buster that we want to supersede). > > On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 18:10:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > My worry if I were to do that is that the installer would still offer to install > > GNOME on s390x, and I don't know what would happen if one chose that (I suppose > > apt would realise it's uninstallable and give a proper error, but maybe things > > would explode). > > > > So if we're going to make task-gnome-desktop uninstallable there, maybe the > > installer shouldn't offer to install it, and that needs changes somewhere in > > tasksel or d-i. > > Some questions whose answers I think might be relevant to determining > how much effort is justifiable here: > > * Do s390x users install with debian-installer? > * If so, do they install desktop tasks that way? > * Does GNOME (the desktop, as opposed to individual apps) work on s390x > in earlier Debian releases? (If, as I suspect, the answer is "we don't > know, nobody has tried it" then that is itself useful information.) I don't have any answers here. My searching debian-boot@ for “s390x” in the body and “installation-report” in the subject returned this small list of bug reports: #575682, #296930, #608407, #694771, #851790, #859889, #923524 (which you know about…). Anyway, just to confirm: if one hacks an archive to get gnome-core out of the amd64's Packages file, tasksel (run from a chroot rather than from d-i, configured with this hacked repository) still lists the gnome desktop task as an available option… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAlx9aoQACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSBhYQ/8DYKCToUz/8pA4614XjbcNXalLj6SD9T/Ol20WjdVOwm/aO58CINs/HPB rGFdPXQbT/x+I4OBVDNWVWJA2sfD0cET4Ysvae4aJU1uUTdV6liAG41kCQcbsZUg ZdCw4zDCCFDt8W0/BB7e4CIb5kLXoP749j6/yWLrJBG92I+1UGSEYjC37WHa904P o0IqEmd/dmjrWhP14JxYHUT2fTbwG8u3GmMzXaaMiIxPQakI4BFzVmFnnIv2BpVf MnnTWO+bGD85lRavNtKYQdssbj2jqtOsaaVz3ts/Tp1/cIKmPwt0jq5FgKbgAX20 UVayaGP12pwWXfzW2Cnye4ZyeMnrB98fnPIcR20BAuIzgJZq+T2kZHVKUov6RnJ5 PARIycly4MQdHhpIiANfsai89pVxOUYQwQD/q/KPl0AAQZ0vp0topeBvhk2Gm8EY CaRtiEmxh4W0qcaqhezzYQKkeCFENcMq9fZQZYkuHWxrP81d+ux/TdEDhUOTk48/ 5q23mXfzkvn68/nnpsKhedh9jnYBTk/KeiwFbSWvW9RHFPShSoJFUlrHJqvIroIZ 5/ekXJFWRfAd+fylnnfZLWN67stG98ry72B0LJEQBV540peeOAoeqkoyIeHIz5+f ptdI5SqK0S0pGUwLYZQfeiO9wnkMzHN1zZFBwqxc+wbTWw6YxA0= =jNoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----