Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Simon McVittie <[email protected]> (2019-03-02):
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > >   meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is not
> > > >   the full GNOME 3 desktop used on other architectures, for example
> > > >   the GNOME-2-derived gnome-session-flashback
> 
> In the absence of other progress, I've staged this in git. I'll release
> it soon if nobody else in the team gets there first. The resulting
> metapackage appears to be installable on a s390x buster qemu VM with only
> sid as an apt source (so, only able to see the version of gjs in sid that
> we want to migrate, and not the one in buster that we want to supersede).
> 
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 18:10:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > My worry if I were to do that is that the installer would still offer to install
> > GNOME on s390x, and I don't know what would happen if one chose that (I suppose
> > apt would realise it's uninstallable and give a proper error, but maybe things
> > would explode).
> > 
> > So if we're going to make task-gnome-desktop uninstallable there, maybe the
> > installer shouldn't offer to install it, and that needs changes somewhere in
> > tasksel or d-i.
> 
> Some questions whose answers I think might be relevant to determining
> how much effort is justifiable here:
> 
> * Do s390x users install with debian-installer?
> * If so, do they install desktop tasks that way?
> * Does GNOME (the desktop, as opposed to individual apps) work on s390x
>   in earlier Debian releases? (If, as I suspect, the answer is "we don't
>   know, nobody has tried it" then that is itself useful information.)

I don't have any answers here. My searching debian-boot@ for “s390x” in
the body and “installation-report” in the subject returned this small
list of bug reports: #575682, #296930, #608407, #694771, #851790,
#859889, #923524 (which you know about…).


Anyway, just to confirm: if one hacks an archive to get gnome-core out
of the amd64's Packages file, tasksel (run from a chroot rather than
from d-i, configured with this hacked repository) still lists the gnome
desktop task as an available option…


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jNoO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.