Re: Bug#935250: , #935252: buster-pu: mutter, gnome-shell

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:58 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:41:31 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I uploaded some mutter fixes to unstable after the buster release
> > which
> > I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps
> > for
> > 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point.
> 
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:44:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I uploaded some GNOME Shell fixes to unstable after the buster
> > release
> > which I think would be worth considering for a buster update -
> > perhaps
> > for 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point.
> 
> The GNOME team is starting to upload GNOME 3.34 to unstable, so these
> 3.30.x updates have had as much testing in testing/unstable as they
> are
> going to get. I haven't seen any regression reports, either from
> testing/unstable users or after asking stable users to test a
> prerelease.
> 
> Do these changes seem OK to upload to proposed-updates now
> that 10.1 is out? Early in the cycle is probably a good time,
> to get as much opportunity as possible for people to try them via
> proposed-updates. Please let me know if any of the upstream fixes are
> considered too intrusive and need to be reverted.

Please go ahead; thanks.

Regards,

Adam