Re: Bug#968204: Removal of packges which depend on GTK2
Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Mon 26 Oct 2020 at 08:59PM +01, Pál Tamás Ács wrote: >> >> Can you please take your conspiracy theories, mis-information and >> top-posting elsewhere, like /dev/null? Thanks. > > > I'm not sure where exactly my statements were conspiracy theories or > mis-information. Or you just don't like my opinion because it's kind of > different from the mainstream that you're used to? > > Please point out one or more of my statements that you think is false. I don't think this removal bug report is really an appropriate place for a wide-ranging discussion like this. In the interests of efficiency, I'd be grateful if both of you could take it elsewhere. Thank you! -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAl+XSUsZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQJ76D/9dX4E+8ghyYEPvQ868FFI/ LC/CC7suuPYvxJdAq9LxBDEvHWLA7vXFhBS1Wsw4wmvM+glw6t1rLdcsRmPCL5nw LSYjrk0IaudK6QFRm7XG76WJJbJSDxlZcWwcTc5FzEHBFp2JufEE9g+sgNJoB2w8 IksJEi0Ycz0KZdV6HMI4BanqSrc7FTkVhN1o0tUhyBwUlLiLq7AfTlbyt2LROGGX Ug0uVhAy/RXfWtbvpBcnisNtRsPm4sqwYkorv2GL2IiIRuANDbi5h0ebSWcmR5+S i9dFJO96aYcZDqPoRtV+HhtHIdDN2akRONKo5O0gPbHV90YQT4hgIoMj1qdBhXVW GyRlMYD36XwU0HXnt4loftZdacHT20HctLKTrP/iea7iMc7OML7HmVe3zOCaOskl zD3emFpJUMSp7IlqM+O2X+h+VVyafqxaP/LjFIzti/ZeVmr193PCJP0ipsk3DIuB SadENaN9TQKFOg94iPyec9nNrfOApy1YammzS84vTzz59Xg3oCIeeeVxcP6becAH XBnCCzT9cqH02i093DKYGI7S45a/kM4SY5B7dZUe3e8Fjpp1SozttgVvF/hpmOT1 9G5gO+C3dfCyOl9SLmqViprUEtWmHPPCQWcjU+euMc7JzLlapZ3edEVaBkdp43Gi YNYaSIfRMyb+9pyqUkUe4g== =Mu0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----