Re: GNOME 44 Beta for Debian experimental?

Jeremy Bícha <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome
Message-ID <CAD+GYvy6FUovEvPb8FTL4YLCK6d1qzObKCdOYz9RAxtT+bQbKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:09 AM Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 06:28:15 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > GNOME 44 Beta will be released in a few days. Is it ok to push GNOME
> > 44 stuff to Debian experimental?
>
> I think yes, but I'd like a branch from the last version intended for
> bookworm to exist first.

For most apps, we won't have a need to do any more bookworm uploads.
Can we wait to fork a branch from the latest bookworm git release tag
until we actually need it, or are expected to need it? Like we need
gnome-shell but we probably wouldn't need something like devhelp or
gnome-mines.

> We can either do debian/master + debian/experimental (like dbus and glib2.0)
> or debian/unstable + debian/master (like you've preferred to do in most of
> GNOME in the past). Either works as long as it's clear.

Yeah, my preference once we fork is  debian/bookworm  since that
matches the convention we have been using for Debian Stable updates.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.