Re: Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:53:58 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Sun 03 Mar 2024 at 02:00am GMT, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:47 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: >> I have proposed a change for glib2.0/experimental at >> https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/32 which >> implements the "delete the old postrm" approach. > > I've uploaded this to experimental, incorporating feedback from Helmut. > (Thank you for your thorough review!) > > Due to the time required to put each version through build/testing, > I am not able to propose a corresponding upload for unstable tonight > (and having this version in experimental for at least a few hours is > probably not a bad plan in any case). Closing this bug, then. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmYEzbYZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQMYWD/9OBtpfQc7HTToiCfK3DSuT NwqI0UfSqUkdHAz6udBgmVSnlPLts/Q0aqFMHnn8SHAq+oBRRWnT5bOWg66Djjsl L0n5E1g9OF0EQr9ODQnpvgjhxBqIw8ZHkqyITr0f6b8M+uyC05c+k2l6isDWQCMy j1ByKQ8OND/idw982l/YSiBUPbHOd4H2lhsjMvAk37oPxhYyhDN+AvgWwUa8s+aW SsTIKt6ytQd7zQVBQsup2fuDcn3GQaIsWj18rCc1BRhFPeXj7p5gStrusV436TPy GzOrF0zAVFB1byhHzFYn1bfgYKwq1aav6t79SmPc/kGI6WZ8ATM6g4TNGOOoCKZE SBK+z6Yv+iG4p+zQYHy1hxdxLk0PKM639lrOmB5wr/F8r8BdMyJofys4Y/LNKxLK dW0W8w1XEDI3B/HF69Arf82jSEBEoBh8cNLWekLIVrH1WgX8hWJJWFw2AUEwFKsg bAF29v0slqK94xBuQQ1TBqczPUTgh6pdBAt4twWmSoN8eIOoxvl3KJDC0RwIDbuh NoVKcROFPb5YX0eJs0QWaG9uf850w0RSnlUuROegq0foLyj2fQPHp+Jt9I+unkZs TYM8yUL3U4n+uBI7aGZGP52bnaeehdYbN/gnu92A8AGt7f4R6XtXVsNrm7ylqATk EF3JsaFnwm5Y06pkDn+NPA== =TCwa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----