Bug#1082122: RM: gdm3 [armel] -- NBS; #1080521

On 15.10.24 20:26, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Thanks for doing this removal, but it looks as though all binary packages
> from the gdm3 source were removed as a batch, whether they were NBS or not:

Hmm, strange I thought I had adapted the parameters accordingly.

> Is there a way that I should have titled this bug more clearly to
> distinguish between "remove binary package gdm3" and "remove all binaries
> from src:gdm3" while meeting the ftp team's naming conventions?

I am afraid this is not possible. But as I am only the auxiliary 
RM-worker, I am not completely sure.
> We can work around the removal of gir1.2-gdm-1.0, libgdm-dev and libgdm1
> on armel by re-uploading the gdm3 source package, and I'll aim to do
> that soon if it doesn't migrate on its own.

Ok, great and sorry for the hassle.

   Thorsten