Re: Bug#1080154: meta-gnome3: revisit gnome-initial-setup vs. gnome-tour for new trixie installations
Jeremy Bícha <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:54:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD+GYvw83mEwsDJRh4QO6Hnohe2-KFzP5igFtTFPkJp=X8A8oQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:18 PM Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote: > +0. Do we want it installed by default in d-i and live images even though > it isn't going to be used, or do we want to make it a Suggests and hope > that OEMs realise they can add it to their (presumably already lightly > customized) package set? One detail I only learned recently is that apt is configured to keep otherwise obsolete packages installed if they are still listed as Suggests when upgrading. I want to document this for our notes, thinking of adding a debian/README.source to meta-gnome3. Suggests sounds fine as a place to put things that are in upstream gnome-core that we are excluding from our default install. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha