Re: MBF: Removal of GTK2 from forky
Antoine Le Gonidec <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Jan 2026 11:51:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--bzsSCnZUR3B+P3Uj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 09:15:01AM +0100, S=C3=A9bastien Noel a =C3=A9crit : > Can't we keep GTK2 in the archive like src:gcc-3.3 was ? > With no active development, just making sure it still builds. I would love to keep the ability to install GTK2 libraries (both amd64 and = i386) =66rom Debian repositories. Many non-free Unity3D video games rely on a plu= gin named ScreenSelector.so to provide the user with display option (including setting the main screen and the game window size), this plugin is linked against GTK2. A much better option would be a GTK2 =E2=86=92 GTK3 compatibility wrapper, = like has been done for SDL 1.2 =E2=86=92 SDL 2, but I don=E2=80=99t know of any such= wrapper. Without a package in the archive or a compatibility wrapper, we can expect a myriad of more-or-less hacky workarounds, leading to breakages due to user mistakes. --- Short version: Please orphan GTK2 instead of removing it. --bzsSCnZUR3B+P3Uj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEABYKAB0WIQSUsdxM90hewW6X7Jhja3j5HOuA2AUCaWIvMAAKCRBja3j5HOuA 2EAoAPdZ9O/8pjEKfQ/Fc++FQNzkMtRZoMTVrIuxJza+Mv3OAP9H6eKB2O+W5di9 aOksEihVa3uDyh12JBpc+7sw6BomAw== =ZHFj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bzsSCnZUR3B+P3Uj--