Re: Bug#1142414: ITP: resources -- a simple yet powerful monitor for your system resources and processes
"Pieter Lenaerts" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:28:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon Jul 27, 2026 at 12:54 PM CEST, Jeremy B=C3=ADcha wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 7:57=E2=80=AFAM Pieter Lenaerts <[email protected]= rg> wrote: >> Todo: look at autopkgtests & fix lintian reports. Wait for dependencies = to >> reach unstable. > > We can upload to experimental now. > > I pushed a few more commits. Thanks Jeremy. I relaxed the dependency on rmp-serde again to >=3D 1.3.0 since 1.3.1 is not available yet in any repo. I added a thx to the changelog. I feel it's right. I set the distribution in the changelog to experimental, but I have no uplo= ad rights. Not sure if you want to upload or want to give me upload rights on = this package already. I was going to enable salsa-ci, but I see I can't enable it in the salsa project. Will you do the necessary? What should we do with the sub crate process_data? 1) Should it be a separate package or is all fine if we build like this? 2) I'm also wondering if disabling the process_data tests is fine? But then again, if the resources tests pass, then ... I guess that's what we need= ? What do you think? Br, Pieter --eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIkEABYKADEWIQQrLg4/tS9aUxZMq8oFuPKwcqDg6wUCamdc6RMccGxlbmFlQGRp c3Jvb3Qub3JnAAoJEAW48rByoODrlfABALxI0SWehQj8WCPok//mnnKTFuO+FSZ9 szhenlcTwh02AQD3Xu1LNdSFNIAFuzIxBrVFidtkYTtZG1q7Z1sR9kc8Bw== =cqRq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048--