Re: Bug#1142414: ITP: resources -- a simple yet powerful monitor for your system resources and processes

"Pieter Lenaerts" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:28:08 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon Jul 27, 2026 at 12:54 PM CEST, Jeremy B=C3=ADcha wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 7:57=E2=80=AFAM Pieter Lenaerts <[email protected]=
rg> wrote:
>> Todo: look at autopkgtests & fix lintian reports. Wait for dependencies =
to
>> reach unstable.
>
> We can upload to experimental now.
>
> I pushed a few more commits.

Thanks Jeremy.

I relaxed the dependency on rmp-serde again to >=3D 1.3.0 since 1.3.1 is
not available yet in any repo.

I added a thx to the changelog. I feel it's right.

I set the distribution in the changelog to experimental, but I have no uplo=
ad
rights. Not sure if you want to upload or want to give me upload rights on =
this
package already.

I was going to enable salsa-ci, but I see I can't enable it in the salsa
project. Will you do the necessary?

What should we do with the sub crate process_data?
1) Should it be a separate package or is all fine if we build like this?
2) I'm also wondering if disabling the process_data tests is fine? But then
   again, if the resources tests pass, then ... I guess that's what we need=
?

What do you think?

Br,

Pieter

--eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIkEABYKADEWIQQrLg4/tS9aUxZMq8oFuPKwcqDg6wUCamdc6RMccGxlbmFlQGRp
c3Jvb3Qub3JnAAoJEAW48rByoODrlfABALxI0SWehQj8WCPok//mnnKTFuO+FSZ9
szhenlcTwh02AQD3Xu1LNdSFNIAFuzIxBrVFidtkYTtZG1q7Z1sR9kc8Bw==
=cqRq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--eb370fda16d47c59eb542989ed766ffad2bc918645c736326ac54ff6d048--