Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2

Federico Grau <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:29:45 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.alioth.pkg-go-maintainers,gmane.linux.debian.devel.ham
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:20:06AM +0100, Andrew Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 1:30 AM Federico Grau <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Pardon the sloppy efforts here, I'll aim to improve.
> 
> No worries. We all learnt that from our mistakes. Please remember to
> do merge request next time then.
> 
> I quickly check the commit history. I saw you have a commit to updated
> debian/changelog earlier than commits. And debian/changelog didn't
> included your later commits for refresh exist patch for 0.19.2-1
> release. Is this something you intend to not included the later
> commits and hold for future 0.19.2-2 release?
> 

Thanks for the review Andrew --

We may be getting too deep into transaction details with the Git commits.

The d/changelog commit (35edc1f) I created was meant to represent the work I
completed that weekend for this update to `pat' v0.19.2 .  It happens I
committed the d/patches a few minutes after the d/changelog commit.  The
d/patches I updated only include the new upstream version in man pages and
upstream changelog...

I have now updated d/changelog for release 0.19.2-2, mentioning the minor
d/patches edits.  Note: given this minor change with no questions on my part,
I did not create a MR for this effort.

Hopefully we can get this release of pat 0.19.2 into unstable.

Looking ahead, I see pat was recently "Marked for autoremoval on 25 April due
to golang-github-howeyc-gopass: #1130525".  I will submit a bug/issue upstream
noting this risk, but ideally pat can remain in debian while upstream adapts.

Regards,
donfede

Fede Grau

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)