Re: Security of 6to4 (was: Re-prioritizing 6to4 over v4 addresses)

Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus C Gottwald <[email protected]> writes:
    Marcus> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 15:13:13
    Marcus> -0300):

    >> Are you aware of the security implications?  Unless you route the
    >> relevant gateway prefixes yourself, you will be using a 6to4
    >> gateway which can be anywhere and belong to anyone, subject to
    >> the whims of BGP anycast.

    Marcus> Security as in availability or as in integrity? With regard
    Marcus> to availability: Well, yes, a tunnel might be more reliable,
    Marcus> but I've seen 6to4 working very well so far.

And, if you want end-to-end integrity, we have IPsec, and you can even
usefully use AH thanks to the lack of NAT.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.