Re: problem configuring squeeze

Tim Weippert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi, 

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:55:00PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]> writes:
> > > On Mon, 16 May 2011, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > >> I don't think that will be much of a problem, given that you probably
> > >> have full control over the vserver network.  Routing on longer prefixes
> > >> than /64 work just fine, and there are many advocating using /126 or
> > >> /127 for point to point links.
> > >
> > > /126 is fine.  /127 is not really a good idea beacause of DAD, and it is
> > > not like using /126 instead of /127 is going to waste too much valuable
> > > address space (unlike /31 versus /30 in IPv4).
> > 
> > No, waste is not an argument.  The main argument for both /127 and
> > /126 is to avoid having unused addresses on a link.  But /126 will still
> > leave one adress, which is why some prefers /127 instead. Although this
> > does mean that you have to ignore the router anycast address.
> > 
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
> > 
> > Well, that's one informational opinion.  There's also the recent
> > standards track opinion: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164
> 
> Heh.
> 
> > The nice thing about standards is that there's so many of them :-)
> 
> Well, as long as you request that the equipment supports rfc6164, it
> certainly is far more sane than running DAD on a /127.
> 
> But we need also to check that Linux supports rfc6164 and doesn't do
> anything too idiotic.  It certainly can screw up rather nicely on IPv4 /31
> when ifconfig is used (instead of iproute) because it does not EINVAL the
> broadcast address (requested by stupid ifconfig) as it should nor considers
> a IPv4 /31 link to be point-to-point in the first place.

I had tested this on an tunnel link with an /127 and it fails. With an /126
all works fine. So, i think  at least on squeeze this is currently no option.
Haven't tried wheezy or sid.

cheers, 
tim


-- 
Tim Weippert
http://weiti.org - [email protected]
GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1  398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.