Re: Re: schein.debian.org
"Jeffrey B. Green" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pascal Hambourg writes: > Gerald Turner a écrit : >> >> Sorry about all that noise, I simply changed interfaces like: >> >> iface eth0 inet6 static >> address 2001:470:e861::8 >> netmask 48 > > The network prefix length should always be 64, unless you know exactly > what you are doing. > >> - gateway 2001:470:e861::1 >> + up ip -6 route add 2000::/3 via 2001:470:e861::1 mtu 1480 > > Using 2000::/3 instead of default or ::/0 for the default global unicast > route was only necessary on very old (2.4 ?) kernels. > > The MTU 1480 suggests that there is some 6in4 tunnel encapsulation on > the path and one node does not do its job properly. It could be either : > > - the remote tunnel endpoint has IPv6 MTU set to 1480 but does not send > ICMPv6 "packet too big" when dropping too big a packet ; > - the server or a node before it drops ICMPv6 "packet too big" ; > - the remote tunnel endpoint has IPv6 MTU set to 1500 but does not > fragment properly 6in4 datagrams ; > - some node on the path drops 6in4 fragments ; > - the local tunnel endpoint does not reassemble properly 6in4 fragments > > or many more causes. It may be a local problem, e.g. see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/06/msg00040.html -jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]