Re: address and port translation (NAT) no longer required in IPv6 -- but...

Thanks!

Can you provide some specific model numbers?  I'll need a box that can  
do IPv6 tunneling over IPv4, since none of the ISP's I have access to  
have native IPv6 or any plans for it in the foreseeable future.  Of  
course, it will also need to be able to do basic stateful fire-wall  
stuff, and the IPv4 side will need to do NAT and port translation.

Thanks!

Rick


On Dec 27, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:

> Most of the manufacturers already do (or don't you consider sub-$100AU
> cheap?)
> Apple, Allied Telesis,  AVM, Buffalo Tech, Cisco, D-Link, Funkwerk  
> E.C.,
> *cough* Juniper Networks, Linksys, Sonicwall, Trendnet. All sell  
> "cheap"
> home/office routers. That's an incomplete list - and I've not covered
> enterprise solutions.