Re: auto6to4
Andrey Rahmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 01:40:18PM +0200, Jens Link wrote: > 6to4? The soon to be deprecated protocol? I don't think that it makes > much sense to use it or provide a package. See > > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/6to4-how-bad-is-it-really > > for details. > > 6in4 provide e.g. by tunnelbroker.net or sixxs is a much better > solution (if your provider doesn't offer native IPv6). I call it broken too: http://img2.ipv6-test.com/speedtest/result/2012/06/06/1f36f5e19f7de3410a31971e127f373e.png Well, 192.88.99.1 is not available here at all but I suspect that if my ISP provided it, the speed would be much more acceptable. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPz08sAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLhCeYP/iozBartNARONWf5ATEMFUQ9 wyJZ09cNet1m40g/QHEVBCXPJKRYWE5ZFoUy7OWOYX5/bUeAV+O/wInXXmOlEyEt wbvzk7Y0bCqYLy3la6ajYkT7MhPMmqsPAxMNLqcf01WvI154cveFwDcowR6l4gUC hYON3+kmToRmxvEw/AhBwwN3AYPeT4nrL5yhiVoH4kDnxw9fpGk+fy1pKJKhGQpu Z9jOyl9rMoJ+nV9V8dwo+l5Sj6pQeyv98KFr0zqYnt3usoWGV8YdjD7Tit5R4fSw 1FIJ1QafhF11HdWXwgPAdbWsRJSuwc9Zm9tBFupNQJOYyvIroapz0x5gbYb3qPz2 x8x1bIKJMUMqFXpm6Dk7Z/cQXcDyLhPaxACia0UgZYgZZYoDCRRdkYOKIJUf/Dzn 7TRrzAVKDYkgLDcyaXRtyxbGk4nA+0oKdAmTBD24Ivpclx4k3H2Wa3eDElVgBoIe gcrC1eLggxIzTNqvE+jYyH/6GGiS9vqyXDXBjUpWS7TMJ9Kg6N5qk8O7ls+lFwXU wA2Q7uzMWWmW8JmiOHxUO0x6YkJIr6IC4X1GoghVUA0k6MTu1/4yh5Em3xKL61Nf 9VmqpmSL7tHn4ORoopdZp22e8WNWU2Vb7ifxCExKOSpmZDsIDd3KTWOB280DjEzQ ryC7ps0PVRNQtyFm9KGO =kWFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----