Re: auto6to4

Andrew Shadura <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:18 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6
Message-ID <20120629112918.7d6275e5@ileemo>
Hello,

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:04:04 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Miredo is almost always more reliable.

I don't agree. It's more reliable in that meaning that in works
regardless of you being behind NAT, but the quality of service can't be
better most probably.

> What I wish is that the Linux kernel's 6to4 code would be updated so
> that I could create routes over the sit interface for non 2002:
> traffic.

What prevents you from routing non-2002:: traffic over sit interfaces?

-- 
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=IoPN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----