Re: Public IPv6 anycast service?

Philipp Kern <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:28:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6
Organization The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Jan Lühr wrote:
> -> Routing - yes it is an option. Some (all?) Linux distributions by
> default do not accept small routes using radvd, Link-Layer multicast is
> not really possible. Thus, it requires to routers to cooperate.

It's always the question what your goal is. Considering L2 domains: If
it's redundancy there are protocols like CARP and VRRP. If it's load
sharing it might make sense to use multicast, the "routes via DHCPv6"
draft expired in the meantime and would've been useful to e.g. evenly
distribute two routes among the hosts on the same link.

If you're looking at L3 domains, you'd require the cooperation of the
routers anyway.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTUUSAAAoJEERuJUU10FbseeAH/iSzYpUIHFs7MnCebb3CD0aZ
Zjnxqyb93xrFZNXIIalROSX5AUm3xWU4erH2ODsFIUg4VhR1l2J2/RwhRjyj9lTj
9YHu7fdmhshHpePLOUdTegOyraz/8MhD2o97ZTqNpM+IOTUtgs0KWvmexxpte1qX
zdMiVUU9bM/0PA45jO46/OAt7LOqvbAeMUZyuRQ5nZbhlESf/EqPMFuGs3Wpzmgn
jZZZdZZg0qXOLn/6rqvTJNkGT8U6N/in9jbHOHM7UpTsWB+VXQsBtEDMLFwsJ/ff
VvMp0CU9LorGGTFvwt3Hb2WJeXgSEEUOElpiNJqALin6lPQ46VLfcHrU147Ki3s=
=/t64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----