Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sun, 14 May 2017 17:07:56 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> wrote: > For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice for > using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? > Consider the following: > - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix delegation from ISP and > shares it, and also a ULA prefix, over the LAN with DHCPv6 > - there is a small server or NAS running Debian on the LAN So, this is all outlined in RFC7084 (replacing RFC6204), and post-CC OpenWRT/LEDE do a very good job of doing exactly what you describe. Also, the HOMENET WG has done work to make this work when you have multiple uplinks, and multiple routers with-in the "home", and do this in a zerotouch way. There are many opportunities to contribute to this effort. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAlkYxysACgkQgItw+93Q 3WWy7wf/VJuTqKYjCDEoakutGcd+jTngoV80MX1iXVV9yKviQ++PKqNiHi2pIXZK YJJYZOfAIcKQO24QfZGSVB4UevaZLcCLLjO0OdYDQUdNnR7yqN6yn8ShpkgPBYVa GPbYSlofMZbGr0fSadTvbDbBLWHcgF+W26NocZXvWTsrbBq4DL+B0iijObG2JjhU bRXlARd2swtfKO2LC3w0ZED8JdUbm7WPgsN2a7sRV7Sgl3j+2nE5BM+yDTfKhIro SP5WSRveOmnWfVtHaPZSNDMhoLsb8KxaXrn+ShA5iobn4SG8Ja2NZkQuROe1xx+T DG61S4UcECUk1nBe/egDa8mzQSTnLg== =M5+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----