Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sun, 14 May 2017 17:07:56 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> wrote:
    > For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice for
    > using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP?

    > Consider the following:

    > - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix delegation from ISP and
    > shares it, and also a ULA prefix, over the LAN with DHCPv6

    > - there is a small server or NAS running Debian on the LAN

So, this is all outlined in RFC7084 (replacing RFC6204), and post-CC
OpenWRT/LEDE do a very good job of doing exactly what you describe.

Also, the HOMENET WG has done work to make this work when you have multiple
uplinks, and multiple routers with-in the "home", and do this in a zerotouch
way.

There are many opportunities to contribute to this effort.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAlkYxysACgkQgItw+93Q
3WWy7wf/VJuTqKYjCDEoakutGcd+jTngoV80MX1iXVV9yKviQ++PKqNiHi2pIXZK
YJJYZOfAIcKQO24QfZGSVB4UevaZLcCLLjO0OdYDQUdNnR7yqN6yn8ShpkgPBYVa
GPbYSlofMZbGr0fSadTvbDbBLWHcgF+W26NocZXvWTsrbBq4DL+B0iijObG2JjhU
bRXlARd2swtfKO2LC3w0ZED8JdUbm7WPgsN2a7sRV7Sgl3j+2nE5BM+yDTfKhIro
SP5WSRveOmnWfVtHaPZSNDMhoLsb8KxaXrn+ShA5iobn4SG8Ja2NZkQuROe1xx+T
DG61S4UcECUk1nBe/egDa8mzQSTnLg==
=M5+7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----