static lease is ignored
Andrea Borgia <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Aug 2019 11:45:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi. I have two "testing" installations with corresponding static lease in the router; in its logs I see the lease gets requested and granted. Problem is, both systems do not adopt that address but they have: - a /128 (different from the lease, unknown origin) marked "scope global noprefixroute" - a /64 marked "scope global temporary dynamic" - another /64 marked "scope global mngtmpaddr noprefixroute" - a link-local address The end result is name resolution fails and systems are only reachable via ipv4 fallback. Privacy-wise the system is already preferring the PE address, which is good. How I find out the origin of that /128 and, most important, the reason why the lease is ignored? Both systems are using type 4 DUID, though it probably doesn't matter as long as the router has a matching entry. Thanks, Andrea. P.S.: this is a spin-off from an earlier post on OpenWRT's forum: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/stale-dhcpv6-leases-under-network-dhcp-and-dns/42535/7