Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf
Wookey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.java,gmane.linux.debian.ports.arm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wookware |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024-03-27 15:27 +0000, Wookey wrote: > On 2024-03-26 22:28 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > I hacked that, and I tried to do armel and armhf as well but > > dak stopped me, whereas mini-dak was not as strict. > > What was the actual problem with uploading the images you built? Just > not having any corresponding source? Or something more complicated? Answering my own question: There have been a couple of new openjdk-17 uploads (latest is: 17_17.0.11~7ea-1) so Thorsten's bootstrap build (17.0.10+7-1) is out of date. But it does a great job of filling the self-dependency so I can build the current version. So I now have all the pieces (on armhf, not checked armel yet but hopefully it matches) Building now... Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEER4nvI8Pe/wVWh5yq+4YyUahvnkcFAmYER5gACgkQ+4YyUahv nkd7/xAAmZt03QFn4ZmKswP6Suk58ZSzyiA0Yp8+AwywhY5X2Psqv4bCzpXPyi64 QNqZvCGhnldy2uEeYnPcuVlsQPfMF3Dxx4PRhCutX41EeMPBcYQs9hI6v/VBSLb4 bdsFsQpEMbihRGU8Zyg7EvRGUV7ue80YdOAweTfNX5TSCWViYbOg6QzjSqqJ182N UySMQ41vfXX+WDMuG9Ck6ck7evrRggd4ZEnr/v/rvCv1NNPMskrS6HRi4Pj+dc+y DjJqMcYGWvJXMkTNIK88FSdO54YvLGWB4C4GX1ZnoxFy8dVt2x/ij1r8/9vd76xz 18vJ5PPadGH+d72LLtq/oY2Wflku2RsBC/qkBgID7Iis+NjAIpt/faAG6bMCEMJP M4zLagyKtYhSTm/jCuCEKKKnl9L4/C/5Fi4ExcmsxB0YmEpputiJ9JVjGdzk3EQA CJTZ1D1CZQk1GrsCXIOoSphrS8YxCX/6KyBqbi2Ps2heQaNtFXkO2UCZEuCjV2wC 6U2rebboCEziqGCvYmcqL2h+0tQo0kdCOVuKKy04tGtPxfKhmwKoHjhy+Go+GWws eMbLJgOUGQlWJEKWsZeoPWBeJWrBBonMpf7OfYPyAMHiei+trmy780RiSvoHXxty GhMa/G+FZmzpxSY3hQSKfjgX0g999fWjanxcJjGInatNRgVyg8Y= =ukh/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----