Re: Status of axis in debian

Pierre Gruet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.java
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

Le 10/07/2024 à 15:52, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit :
> (Resending to the correct address list; sorry for the noise)
> 
> El 10/07/24 a las 10:41, Santiago Ruano Rincón escribió:
>> Dear Java packaging team,
>>
>> (Please CC: me when replying, I am not subscribed to the list)
>>
>> According to the apache advisory of CVE-2023-51441, axis 1.x has been
>> EOL'ed upstream:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8nrm5thop8f82pglx4o0jg8wmvy6d9yd
>>
>> According to the comment by grid on #debian-security, I understand it is
>> on life support upstream, and there have been fixes for CVEs the last
>> years, including at least one not-unimportant. However, from the above
>> mentioned advisory, upstream recommends to migrate to a "different SOAP
>> engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java."
>>
>> On sid, this is the current list of build dependencies of libaxis-java:
>>
>> jalview
>> jets3t
>> jglobus
>> starjava-datanode
>> starjava-dpac
>> starjava-topcat
>> starjava-ttools
>> starjava-vo
>> starjava-votable
>> uimaj
>>
>> So my mail is just to start any discussion to see if it would be
>> appropriate to file bugs on the reverse dependencies, to ask the
>> maintainers if they could study how feasible is to migrate to another
>> SOAP engine.
>>
>> Any thoughts?

Thanks for raising this issue. My first feeling is filing these bug 
reports is sensible, unconditionally.

But also I wonder if we have some reasonable alternative to suggest in 
these bug reports:
- axis2 is unpackaged (could be) and its latest release is 2 years (+ 1 
day) old;
- saaj and jaxws: I can't say if they can provide an alternative to what 
axis does. Perhaps some people there have an opinion?
- Apache CXF, unpackaged as of now but seems to be actively maintained?
- something else?

Do others in the team have some ideas?

>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>   -- Santiago
> 
> 

Best,

-- 
Pierre
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=b5JK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.