Re: gradle reboot -- 2024W49 update

[email protected] Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:49:17 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.java
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 2024-12-14 10:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> 
> what about having two sets of packages? one set encapsulating the 
> bootstrap, which always stays in unstable, and one "production" set, 
> which then migrates to testing? Would that be better to keep the 
> bootstrap knowledge up to date?

That's a possibility, though I would keep them in the same repo and 
manage them using branches, and maybe keep the bootstrap packages only 
in experimental. We are going to need branches to maintain the gradleN 
packages anyway (only support and no opposition so far for renaming to 
gradleN, so we are going this way). But I think having the makefile as a 
backup build method even in production is worth considering, as it's 
very likely that without it some upgrades will require much more work to 
downgrade their build scripts so they work with the currently packaged 
version, if that's possible at all. It also sort of breaks the circular 
dependency, and I think that's good practice.

Cheers,