Re: ca-certificates and backport to bullseye => ca-certificates-java problem
Bastien Roucaries <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Aug 2025 21:25:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.java,gmane.linux.debian.devel.lts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3461172.otXNkdZ6W1@debian-ei> |
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2025, 22:43:35 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Bastien Roucaries a écrit : Hi I have just pushed a version here: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/ca-certificates-java/-/tree/bullseye?ref_type=heads Can you review ? rouca > Le jeudi 31 juillet 2025, 22:30:11 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Vladimir > > Petko a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > As far as I remember, 20230707 removes the circular dependency that > > caused upgrade issues[1][2][3]. It also requires openjdk to trigger > > ca-certificates-java: > > ----JB-jre-headless.postinst.in---- > > # Now that java is fully registered and configured, > > # call update-ca-certificates-java > > dpkg-trigger update-ca-certificates-java > > ------ > > Please check that this snippet is present in bullseye's > > JB-jre-headless.postinst.in of openjdk package. > > No it is not, so that it the path to fix this ? > > 1. first upload a openjdk that trigger update-ca-certificates-java > 2. upload a backport of ca-certificates-java > 3. upload ca-certificates > > rouca > > > Best Regards, > > > > Vladimir. > > > > [1] > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/200375 > > 0 > > [2] > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/199910 > > 3 > > [3] > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/200406 > > 1 > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 1:14 AM Julien Plissonneau Duquène > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I can't help you much there as I didn't check what could break in your > > > case (bullseye). The last time this was discussed on the list was > > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2023/02/msg00011.html > > > > > > According to the PT in bullseye it depends on default-jre-headless which > > > depends on openjdk-11-jre-headless which depends on > > > ca-certificates-java, but I don't see how updating it could cause > > > issues. > > > > > > Maybe Emmanuel or doko could share more details about what could go > > > wrong? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > -- > > > Julien Plissonneau Duquène
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEXQGHuUCiRbrXsPVqADoaLapBCF8FAmiNFHQACgkQADoaLapB CF9oCQ//Xq7M51Weg14y5ShV4+UzkFtRLWn9fpMb69P47caPJPfyj6BXD0Mb8AxR GYLWDuqslwbm1ayresxIVirX13e91LIqAt9oGQ9to4zJmvTKPLdcgIfGsdwARWx2 AuMrBnVebY5Mqa17LDVvMeYJ/Ho1JNGkjSMSmVASTnHHJuWfFE168sGeRdzSwVgY vKEZonbGMhIp3n7WUkdosipI06ul+cAewVvJfsYdXYjX1fYr7xsM1OqGhuNytMha qPYyWF581MiYmapQQKK9Bg3ZrC9u8nIrcfpgny6wO8Jnuw8gAMHK2girczgGilOe D3itaQsRMLUp3Hbd53pUM+VCV+NxQ2BcNYL0T5ytfEa8OA6KE4S06cVvtMhOjXsn kiEryPq+lmaFRQOHic3mnv5gHW43sXgPyCY7Z3mS4vGiwZlu+82WFwrBenorhSsO Z0MyVlhf8K+uH15bcqO44B8EkSp5dQ7Vouotcb7jyjxgwcmBhLtUieb9U0UA/HvH vzR35SH5SPWpubx89C3IdEiXpr7CinOGJwrlzsk1ymJlY9I3n3xA/T2nMIFEFD1d MRfXOQXRExBewOAXE3BVV1QmmjnpFWktdqwGbTcD1bq6OGd5DlgQLMtunC1lYNxj GyaZectGhC8bR8IjW2Bh9b52ID/SOq1QmlyEN/UwYYNhfj2bsaI= =oNRd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----