Re: ca-certificates and backport to bullseye => ca-certificates-java problem
Bastien Roucaries <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:28:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.java,gmane.linux.debian.devel.lts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8983750.qOBuL9xsDt@debian-ei> |
Le vendredi 1 août 2025, 21:25:05 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Bastien Roucaries a écrit : Hi Vladimir, Hi Marc, Could you review this upgradre of ca-certificates-java and view if it is upgrade safe ? I will after a few week upload a ca-certificates rouca > Le jeudi 31 juillet 2025, 22:43:35 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Bastien > Roucaries a écrit : Hi > > I have just pushed a version here: > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/ca-certificates-java/-/tree/bullseye?ref_ > type=heads > > Can you review ? > > rouca > > > Le jeudi 31 juillet 2025, 22:30:11 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Vladimir > > > > Petko a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > As far as I remember, 20230707 removes the circular dependency that > > > caused upgrade issues[1][2][3]. It also requires openjdk to trigger > > > ca-certificates-java: > > > ----JB-jre-headless.postinst.in---- > > > # Now that java is fully registered and configured, > > > # call update-ca-certificates-java > > > dpkg-trigger update-ca-certificates-java > > > ------ > > > Please check that this snippet is present in bullseye's > > > JB-jre-headless.postinst.in of openjdk package. > > > > No it is not, so that it the path to fix this ? > > > > 1. first upload a openjdk that trigger update-ca-certificates-java > > 2. upload a backport of ca-certificates-java > > 3. upload ca-certificates > > > > rouca > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2003 > > > 75 > > > 0 > > > [2] > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1999 > > > 10 > > > 3 > > > [3] > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2004 > > > 06 > > > 1 > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 1:14 AM Julien Plissonneau Duquène > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I can't help you much there as I didn't check what could break in your > > > > case (bullseye). The last time this was discussed on the list was > > > > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2023/02/msg00011.html > > > > > > > > According to the PT in bullseye it depends on default-jre-headless > > > > which > > > > depends on openjdk-11-jre-headless which depends on > > > > ca-certificates-java, but I don't see how updating it could cause > > > > issues. > > > > > > > > Maybe Emmanuel or doko could share more details about what could go > > > > wrong? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Julien Plissonneau Duquène
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEXQGHuUCiRbrXsPVqADoaLapBCF8FAmiS9dkACgkQADoaLapB CF8NMw/9HE+QvTFLGLnFVKshq4Kz3qZ4NmbtFCaDeEne4qdieCgk21Gx+a40oJRc 3siuG0B8Z+UqOLBPcpMQGXc6S9AKIko9sQXp90XojQCHX+Lo48Aeqgu9GgjW9I3s OOuBaUdJ2z23vPJJ/28ob+Zye9jo8NRml7gJf1tyzqTX6p7LaL0rnl65bxuoJLB4 Pkcxs7/XcjDlQqoK4+028RR8iTwfYBu+uYC5h/EBPFspFhYODBSa3eolhtmwofTZ u63uP8rJ/j9uJ8ErvgGetLiHdv0xxE4Xy8EA4kZVg2w6mjZK3/cCUm3+sADpDOUJ XEfdslOk+hr1krZhIy4U2lv0Bf4zHQyzqVaYXsk4IvzK3TfkYoCCf/LRwRj1e3cp kprzm02eRQeTtrFyfdaoy3MURiagL/oe9L6c0EJ6j7CtZ51kP7nIKXLnCu48mSuz yfZ2ZiBtKUgpVcgQ5XBeEYR4VmvnABGqZ4gNvnYf/l+wmXSdo4RGcKzeQVaQmMeZ tmtJsR7e0H8JD0LVDIFU4w1ihOBqgkuY7zTs6I2va8PaMtY/aGiJPdxOh9cmV6AP iEhTqAQg9Oc0CME20CTWjehLlk+FQO67U9Ll6xbrwWtcHPLu8zEDW6ebRgylzGXQ n0UC8QjCyGDUK/BnwBkbUxgDgsEN4VQF8iZbTZmYsPNbV7ogIW4= =2Vj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----