Re: Bug#513535: ITP: peg-e -- peg elimination solitaire game
Andreas Tille <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.jr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901311521041.6479@wr-linux02> |
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> As for Peg-e itself, I agree that it looks like a good candidate. In
> the past my policy has been that any package that I have personally
> tried with the children and had a positive response from them, and I
I'd regard this as a perfectly valid method. You are in the
fantastic situation to have a very close connection to your users -
Your children will probably very open to you about their likes /
dislikes.
> cannot find any other objection to adding, I have added. Or in the
I do not know a reason why anybody should object.
> How we are going to handle user recommendations of software for Debian
> Jr. in general is still an open question and I apologize for the
I think the first possible answer to this "open" question you have
given above yourself.
> apparent lack of care to answering it. We do not mean to exclude other
> project members from the discussion, but the fact is that much of the
> discussion so far has been on irc, so anyone who has not been present
> for such discussions does not get filled in on it.
I admit I refuse to use IRC to not add an additional communication channel
which IMHO just drains additional time from my rare spare time. So it
would be nice to perhaps copy-n-paste important snippets from the logs
(not for me personally, but for other people who might share my habit).
> I will make more of
> an effort to summarize and post such discussions as they happen from
> now on.
That would be halpeful
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de