Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 25, 2003
Rudy Godoy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.jr |
|---|---|
| Organization | KP |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 31/08/2003 at 20:36 Ben Armstrong wrote... > Which of the three packages? Maybe all, i'm getting the sources and taking a look on them, upon on that i'll see, but they doesn't seem hard to mantain. > > If you're serious about adopting them, and you haven't yet applied for > maintainership, I recommend you look over the materials at nm.debian.org and > start your application. > Yes, i'm serious. I've did but since i hadn't advocate it just expired, anyway i'm working on that with a developer and having real packages to work on would be great to support my application and also contribute to this subproject. Yes i've read the documentation before. -Rudy -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | I don't believe in viruses, i run Debian http://debian.org | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://www.apesol.org.pe -*- http://stone-head.org | | GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/UrezVQ8aADQzvSERAsUOAKDQNAQo/gzqMy7Fxd16HC/GSNiTSACfUKZW TwuL6OqwhOA+/F+8V/w62vI= =B7qr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----