Re: Candidates for removal
Andreas Tille <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance,gmane.linux.debian.devel.jr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509291013510.21035@wr-linux02> |
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> These packages are candidates for removal by virtue of having
> been sitting in unstable without being in 'testing' for very long periods.
> It has a few false positives for packages which were kicked out of testing
> recently, but they are pretty good candidates too.
>
> This is based on http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html. I have included
> only packages with RC bugs in this list, and I have also excluded
> the whole libroxen mishmash (something should be done about that, though)
> and all the lg-* packages, as well as packages with "keep this out of
> testing" bugs.
...
> 1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
> Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
> interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to me."
> -- on 21 June. Someone said that they were trying to make a sponsored
> upload on 18 August; I've pinged them.
I hope Debian-Junior guys will do some action ...
It would be a shame to loose this nice thing.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de