Re: Updating the PHP license

Ben Ramsey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On May 21, 2024, at 11:49, Richard Laager <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-05-19 14:53, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>> One of my goals with the RFC is to get rid of the idea of a “PHP License,” so it deprecates the PHP License and *replaces* it with the BSD 3-Clause License. I don’t want there to be a “PHP License, version 4.0.” I think that will continue to cause confusion in the community.
> 
> You (the copyright holders) could do both. That is, the PHP 4.0 license would be the same wording (other than the name) as BSD 3-Clause. That way, you trigger the "any subsequent version" clause, but then you also subsequently relicense PHP itself under BSD 3-Clause directly. This would indicate a clear intention that the PHP License is deprecated, while still getting the "any subsequent version" benefits for existing software.
> 
> Of course, this assumes that you WANT to trigger that option for third-party projects, which you may or may not. (I think you should want that, but it's not my code, so my opinion doesn't really matter.)


Honestly, I hadn’t considered this option before mailing this list, so I’m glad I mailed this list. :-)

After thinking it over, I do think we want to trigger this option for third-party projects, so that they have a clear path to upgrade the BSD 3-Clause license.

Cheers,
Ben
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEAREIAB0WIQToXQMR3fpbrPOmEOewLZeYnIwHGwUCZk1DRAAKCRCwLZeYnIwH
G5KPAP9Zf/isppoyO+OH6U1xRJTb7oxnSeIdzqSrnKdCHUdrnQD/bQjcfKM7FLun
5ulmDrxsasWUwDWSfy/balr7GNOkUVY=
=prcR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.