Re: None FLOSS license for a logo?

Am 27.08.2024 11:58 schrieb Roberto A. Foglietta:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 11:34, Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If your goal is to prevent your project name or logo from being used 
>> in
>> ways that would be misleading to users/consumers (for example "passing
>> off" an extensively modified version of your software as being the
>> original, so that the developer of the modified version can benefit
>> from your good reputation), then trademarks are the legal tool that's
>> designed for that, not copyright. A strategy used in some projects 
>> (for
>> example Firefox, Python, and Debian itself) is to have a Free Software
>> *copyright* license for the logo, combined with a *trademark* license
>> that has restrictions. Debian allows this.
> 
> Which is nothing else than a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 in practice, after all.

This sounds to me that it is not clear if "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0" is allowed 
in Debian GNU/Linux or not. Am I right?
I was posting on that list in expectation that there might be a clear 
statement or policy rule. From the Python group I experience that there 
are always rules for nearly every detail when it comes to packaging. 
Isn't there a list of accepted licences? Or is there an official Debian 
institution I can ask about it?