Re: None FLOSS license for a logo?
"Roberto A. Foglietta" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJGKYO59JrLw4C5RPpS23XMBFkiRL1DtqN=xKzs6igcXw6Mbgw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 12:21, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 27.08.2024 12:07 schrieb Roberto A. Foglietta: > > As long as it is a separate file. Instead, it is converted into a > > bitmap data structure and embedded into the code, that is a derivative > > work and can make a difference. IMHO. > > > > Just a corner case, but written for sake of completeness. > > That brings me to a thought. > > The "original source" of the logo is an SVG file. > From that SVG we "generate" some png or ico files used as icons to > display in a file manager or the application GUI. As long as the SVG is a separate file loaded at running time, the automatic conversation performed by standard libraries is NOT a derivative work. Otherwise, everything that compiles in run-time like Python to feed the CPU with the specific CPU optimised ASM code set instructions would be. Best regards, R-