Re: None FLOSS license for a logo?

"Roberto A. Foglietta" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Message-ID <CAJGKYO59JrLw4C5RPpS23XMBFkiRL1DtqN=xKzs6igcXw6Mbgw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 12:21, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Am 27.08.2024 12:07 schrieb Roberto A. Foglietta:
> > As long as it is a separate file. Instead, it is converted into a
> > bitmap data structure and embedded into the code, that is a derivative
> > work and can make a difference. IMHO.
> >
> > Just a corner case, but written for sake of completeness.
>
> That brings me to a thought.
>
> The "original source" of the logo is an SVG file.
>  From that SVG we "generate" some png or ico files used as icons to
> display in a file manager or the application GUI.

As long as the SVG is a separate file loaded at running time, the
automatic conversation performed by standard libraries is NOT a
derivative work. Otherwise, everything that compiles in run-time like
Python to feed the CPU with the specific CPU optimised ASM code set
instructions would be.

Best regards, R-
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.