Re: None FLOSS license for a logo?

Hello Daniel,

thank you for your reply.

Am 27.08.2024 14:18 schrieb Daniel Hakimi:
> 2. Are you worried about consumer confusion from somebody using your 
> logo
> or a logo that kind of seems like yours (trademark), or are you worried
> about protecting the image, the artwork, and the style of artwork that 
> go
> into it (copyright)?

I am not sure about the answers. But I think it is most about the first 
case you described, if somebody using the logo for another 
project/software not related to ours.

> 3. The cc-by-nd strikes me as the right copyright license here.

How does this fit into the Debian rules? Simon McVittie pointed out that 
"nd" is not compatible with Debian.