Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license
Luke W Faraone <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jul 2025 19:47:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21/07/2025 17:50, Aryan Karamtoth wrote: > I was also suggested by people on debian-mentors to consider adding it > to non-free sources but it wouldn't make any sense for a python library > to be a non-free package when the sole purpose of it is to be used by > other dependent packages which might be free. You always have the option of packaging it in non-free and placing the other dependent packages in contrib. Cheers, Luke Faraone
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEuS/Yvc6WIwJD5cfJbHpwXoSpOGsFAmh+fSoACgkQbHpwXoSp OGstkQf+Kgtgv8K3r5vWPme5wBNd+PAQsmjCWGwajmqCvkyjPFI3PaLCPrH53c8d xdc4oc1DyvE8zQoqKyNmhnj18F23WOWiNo2dwX6+KsvQVDsVniGhppxsPqV4CJZt C2ZN2GOXAHFcgAKfkc5+K5K9EMg2E1hjMcA0yNFVzSgw0SGpb0xAbTvqN2gjWU5q NF8vyTvAUMXQFFXGUa/dhld2b/NvB3aQa1AONJ/dKwyBit39I+Xqo8ruY8Dl17HB FmsSyH6sk/1SZwdH6wyA1u1jg0c9Lnf2QdlzUKKf9H//K4JEeWb5oyfD3VuZq8t0 YMTn9fmMtYfQi6B0c9MPh/l/3JTiKw== =HgtU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----