Re: BSD-2-Clause with 'in this position and unchanged' addition? libarchive
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Sep 2025 11:12:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <2287143.72vocr9iq0@soren-desktop> |
On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 10:40:38 AM Mountain Standard Time Daniel Hakimi wrote: > I fear there might be more than two versions of the BSD 2-clause license. > The BSD licenses were not as strictly distributed and formalized as a lot > of modern, complex, versioned licenses. Accordingly, I think it might be a > little bit pointless to delineate between two of the nearly-equivalent > 2-clause licenses when there are so many versions out there. Unfortunately, there are a whole lot of versions of a lot of licenses. I wish people wouldn’t go creating modified licenses without a *really good reason*, but unfortunately, we can’t always control what upstream does. But we do need to reflect all these custom licenses accurately in debian/copyright. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmi4hRsACgkQwufLJ66w tgNo7A//SpFQmgwHvCgcvpNOFo3HFtDnuks+oXdmgYAKhEmu0jXogyqLnay1SdRM NfvJl2PuBmLExJkeRsX6pUelgfmx6zfR1b3wHi+7x+LVclP8YGHipAp07y05a0wC OjznuiVa4Rw0WQvP88Kywa/OLjMagKBTltMUK8pEZbuG4XacFvW38R2A3MqQqWm3 P9KR1EsClyopi0hN0A8a/Y9kZP+guS5K/6nVfQJREHf0Xma8hDfav+M90Bzk5pWM C0CuLqulG4oct3+GhnaLsKG0Sj1MWrEwAxD5IrJq1A2efq6EUHg2NpenWDOxCGxW e72qmhvvVvusXLHvzmBJtlRsrGgiICn9lIobNI4NKEVYocRu5Bki3xOPNZ/w2cHZ yS7eHo+JNTeu4F1MhvFVWT9Riu6oes8yD9GW1qJYiQ+fFLVqIDmv2+2bo9kEUgzk SRUAGFNL1QfOc1iKp2APQFsuPBeQlR8eWsGOIA/0H/s0xRhdp7eIYA7wADQR9sx5 amFFfSwzeFpcFZD521cdjXp7AtFocSL/BkiTN0zvrzoAXxM3DU6ZUeNicvr0UOI3 UOKJsYLGASYgtQTedDDt0zcZLGln8OFkR/2SaPYYSr2EgSZfYA8t0hUUwjjPupeA 3F0Y6t9jTekuwGdDyEVLWwyXrcnXzGHXZIGd6H2ORe/lQzNTlXM= =dcTi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----