Re: Copyright of console illustrations

Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Sep 2025 09:22:19 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Organization Debian
Message-ID <1904403.atdPhlSkOF@soren-desktop>
On Tuesday, September 9, 2025 1:29:12 AM Mountain Standard Time Andrea 
Pappacoda wrote:
> > The question that I'm left with is- does the non-commercial mandate of 
> > these images destroy DFSG-freeness of the package they're included in? 
> > Personally, I don't think it passes the desert island test, but I also 
> > suspect that level of scrutiny (clearly) violates their original 
> > intent.
> 
> I have another idea instead. Assuming that by "non-commercial" they 
> meant to prohibit usage in non-free projects, but allow usage in 
> DFSG-free projects, this clause does not pose any additional restriction 
> on melonDS. This is because melonDS is GPL, and the GPL imposes that the 
> work always stays GPL - hence free. So the case where these 
> illustrations, included in melonDS, are used inside a larger 
> non-open-source project does not ever happen.
> 
> I know I'm probably stretching it a bit too much here, but I'm just 
> curious to hear your (and Dimensions') opinion on this.

Just to be clear.

1.  To be DFSG-free, a license must allow commercial use.

"No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor

The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a 
specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from 
being *used in a business*, or from being used for genetic research.”

https://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines

2.  The GPL requires allowing commercial use.  Not only may GPL software be 
used by a commercial entity, but GPL software (or any fork thereof) may be 
sold for a price (as long as the source code is available in accordance with 
the GPL).

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLCommercially

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoMilitary

I think that most of the people in this discussion understand both of these 
points, but I thought I would make them explicit in case either of these are 
not clear to someone.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2Lic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----